• To: Mike Fitzgerald <mikefz@w...>
• Subject: Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:33:37 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <4076CE3B.1080103@w...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F5F8@h...> <4076B25D.8030207@e...> <1081523793.15866.73.camel@delleric> <4076CE3B.1080103@w...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Macintosh/20040208)

Mike Fitzgerald wrote:
> +1. "compact" has clearer semantics than "optimised" if the main idea is 
> to optimise for space. -Mike

But as it happens that's not the case. Either way, right now it's just 
my terminology, not the WG's. Suggestions are of course welcome, even 
though if in the end all we disagree on is how to name it I'll call it 
success ;)

-- 
Robin Berjon

• References:
  • RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
    • From: Mike Fitzgerald <mikefz@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
• Next by Date: Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
• Next by thread: Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread