• To: 'Robin Berjon' <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 08:53:48 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>

Yes.  I had never seen the term 'optimized xml' 
used before.  I have seen 'binary'.  The X3D draft standard 
left a slot open for a binary for X3D because

1) Sufficient experience with very large VRML 
   documents proved it was needed for real time 3D.

2) Customers demand it.

Let's see what happens if a packaged document 
set is wanted as well.  That is quite likely.

len


From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin.berjon@e...]

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> References to 'optimized XML' without a clear 
> set of definitions for this.  The slippery slope 
> is evident.

That's why there's a WG about it :)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
• Next by Date: RE: XML-appropriate editing data structures
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
• Next by thread: Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread