• To: elharo@m...
• Subject: Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 15:56:41 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <15e.2d41c8ca.2da311d4@a...>
• References: <15e.2d41c8ca.2da311d4@a...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

> To be approved a spec
> must pass two separate and independent votes: one by those who worked
> on the spec, and one by interested parties who did not participate in
> the development of the spec, and made no investment to be wasted if
> the specification fails to pass the vote. Sadly, I know of no
> standards body that operates in such a bicameral fashion.

Except for the fact that some committee members are also in the second 
voting pool, many standards work this way:  W3C, OASIS, ITU (less sure 
of that).

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • Re: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• Next by Date: RE: WS-Emperor naked?
• Previous by thread: Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• Next by thread: RE: WS-Emperor naked?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread