Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
This suggests to me that XML DSig is basically a questionable idea. Why the obsession with text? It seems like doing this at the Infoset level would be much simpler (and much more efficient). - Dennis Derek Denny-Brown wrote: >Worse... try and do it efficiently, especially in documents which >include DTDs. The cost of normalizing attribute values, as well as >sorting attributes comes up every time I talk with people investigating >use Xml DSig. I can't wait for people to ask for WXS normalization. > >-derek > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...] >>Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 10:31 PM >>To: xml-dev@l... DEV >>Subject: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong >> >>Canonicalizing XML is hard! -Tim >> >> > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an >initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > >The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription >manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php> > > >
|
