• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
• From: "Derek Denny-Brown" <derekdb@m...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:38:12 -0800
• Thread-index: AcQKVy9EDvv/su11SBiX1K+zvjpRSQAZNFCQ
• Thread-topic: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong

Worse... try and do it efficiently, especially in documents which
include DTDs.  The cost of normalizing attribute values, as well as
sorting attributes comes up every time I talk with people investigating
use Xml DSig.  I can't wait for people to ask for WXS normalization.

-derek

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]
> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 10:31 PM
> To: xml-dev@l... DEV
> Subject:  Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
> 
> Canonicalizing XML is hard!  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
    • From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>
  • Re: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Citations (WAS RE: W3C suckered by Micros oft?)
• Next by Date: Re: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
• Previous by thread: [ANNOUNCE] XML Interoperbility Guidelines - Comments/bug reports solicited
• Next by thread: Re: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread