• To: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: Re: GenX and attribute QNames
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:59:39 -0800
• Cc: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>,"xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0403101952350.11281-100000@s...>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0403101952350.11281-100000@s...>

On Mar 10, 2004, at 4:53 PM, Rich Salz wrote:

> Right.  If you're not using the XPath data model internally, but 
> instead
> have an "upward chain" of namespace declarations, you have to take care
> not to output a redundant declaration.

Grumph.  Off to fix genx.
And, I guess, add genxAddQName(w, namespace, value).  -Tim

smime.p7s

• References:
  • Re: GenX and attribute QNames
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: GenX and attribute QNames
• Next by Date: Re: W3C suckered by Microsoft?
• Previous by thread: Re: GenX and attribute QNames
• Next by thread: SAX 2.0.1, 2.0.2 or 2.1?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread