• To: sax-devel@l...
• Subject: SAX 2.0.1, 2.0.2 or 2.1?
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:41:02 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

What version are we giving to this release? The package description 
for org.xml.sax discusses SAX 2.1, and talks about standard exception 
IDs. As I recall this was an experiment and discussion that never 
went anywhere and that we eventually decided was not plausible. Or if 
it was, no one wanted to do the work.

Assuming my recollection is accurate, we need to back this material 
out (or make a separate branch in CVS) before releasing 2.0.1/2.0.2. 
Or maybe I'm misremembering, and this is just a typo and should say 
"SAX 2.0.1 defines a standard SAXParseException.getExceptionId()" 
instead of "SAX 2.1 defines a standard 
SAXParseException.getExceptionId()". Hmm, but I don't see the 
advertised getExceptionId method in the JavaDoc. Thoughts?
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@m...
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml            
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA 

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX CVS
• Next by Date: Missing features in CVS?
• Previous by thread: GenX and attribute QNames
• Next by thread: Value of Citations (WAS RE: W3C suckered by Microsoft?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread