• Subject: RE: GenX and attribute QNames
• From: "Scott Wiseman" <scott@i...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:10:19 -0800
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Disposition-notification-to: "Scott Wiseman" <scott@i...>
• Thread-index: AcQHvgWZbOuaRGT3SRC+Wi4GvqAz2w==
• Thread-topic: GenX and attribute QNames

What are Namespaces? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 5:00 PM
To: Rich Salz
Cc: Elliotte Rusty Harold; xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  GenX and attribute QNames

On Mar 10, 2004, at 4:53 PM, Rich Salz wrote:

> Right.  If you're not using the XPath data model internally, but 
> instead
> have an "upward chain" of namespace declarations, you have to take
care
> not to output a redundant declaration.

Grumph.  Off to fix genx.
And, I guess, add genxAddQName(w, namespace, value).  -Tim






Regards,


Scott Wiseman
Client Development Services
 
Network Consultant Los Angeles
http://www.InterCore.net
 
Consulting, Systems Integration and Outsourcing
http://www.outsourceintelligence.com
 
Exchange Consultant Los Angeles
http://www.Avidware.com
 
Security Consultant Los Angeles
http://www.FastForwardMarcom.com
 
Outsourcing Services in Los Angeles
http://www.OutsourcingAnswers.org
 
Americas Best Singles Dating Service in Los Angeles
http://www.AllAboutSingles.com
 
 
 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: GenX and attribute QNames
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • RE: GenX and attribute QNames
    • From: "Mohan Iyer" <mohan@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C suckered by Microsoft?
• Next by Date: Re: Proposed genx changes
• Previous by thread: RE: GenX and attribute QNames
• Next by thread: RE: GenX and attribute QNames
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread