• To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@g...>,"'XML DEV'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:48:55 -0000
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <402D5B1F.8030401@g...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

Actually Saxon rejects it when running with Xerces, but accepts it when
running with Crimson.

Michael Kay


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@g...] 
> Sent: 13 February 2004 23:18
> To: 'XML DEV'
> Subject:  Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS
> 
> 
> Hi.
> 
> Is this:
> 
> 	<foo:bar:42 xmlns:foo="something"/>
> 
> a wellformed XML.1.0+XMLNS.1.0 document?
> 
> MSXML rejects it, Saxon (Aelfred?) and Xsltproc (gnome libxml) accept 
> it. I think that MSXML is right to complain here (neither 
> "foo:bar" nor 
> "bar:42" are legal NCNames).
> 
> Julian
> 
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org 
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS 
<http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• References:
  • Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS
    • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>

• Prev by Date: Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS
• Next by Date: RE: US Patent 6,687,897
• Previous by thread: Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS
• Next by thread: Re: Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread