• To: 'XML DEV' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS
• From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
• Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:17:51 +0100
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)

Hi.

Is this:

	<foo:bar:42 xmlns:foo="something"/>

a wellformed XML.1.0+XMLNS.1.0 document?

MSXML rejects it, Saxon (Aelfred?) and Xsltproc (gnome libxml) accept 
it. I think that MSXML is right to complain here (neither "foo:bar" nor 
"bar:42" are legal NCNames).

Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • RE: Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: generating XSLT from instances
• Next by Date: RE: Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS
• Previous by thread: generating XSLT from instances
• Next by thread: RE: Test: legal names in XML 1.0 + XMLNS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread