• To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Subject: Re: A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXULSpec
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:42:16 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <403DFB5F.DECB00E8@b...>
• References: <20040226111707.60740.qmail@w...> <403DDA42.8040607@e...> <403DFB5F.DECB00E8@b...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> Did you really mean XBL? [1] It never advanced past the W3C Note stage,
> and that was 3 years ago.

It doesn't change my question regarding the advantage of standardising a 
binding technology of standardising a UI vocabulary that will 
necessarily be limited. Especiallly as there's nothing keeping XBL from 
evolving in the future.

-- 
Robin Berjon

• References:
  • A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free XUL Spec
    • From: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@y...>
  • Re: A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• Next by Date: Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• Previous by thread: Re: A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXULSpec
• Next by thread: What's wrong with a XBL, SVG-RCC, XForms combo?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread