Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 18:13, Andreas Sewe wrote:
> > Not really: I meant a copyright purpose rather than version :-( .
>
> Wouldn't "license" be a better name serving the same purpose? To me
> "copyright" sounds more restrictive than "license" - and more
> restrictive than necessary as well.
Yes, you're right, licence is more general than copyright.
Eric
>
> Besides that I'm in favour of the proposal.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andreas Sewe
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
--
Read me on XML.com.
http://www.xml.com/pub/au/74
Upcoming XML schema languages tutorial:
- Santa Clara -half day- (15/03/2004) http://masl.to/?J24916E96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
