• To: "[XML-Dev]" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version
• From: "Andreas Sewe" <sewe@r...>
• Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:13:17 +0100
• Organization: RBG, TU Darmstadt
• References: <1077268346.10746.948.camel@delleric> <1077270239.10741.1015.camel@delleric>

> Not really: I meant a copyright purpose rather than version :-( .

Wouldn't "license" be a better name serving the same purpose? To me
"copyright" sounds more restrictive than "license" - and more
restrictive than necessary as well.

Besides that I'm in favour of the proposal.

Regards,

Andreas Sewe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name) of elements
• Next by Date: RE: schema validate key uniqueness attribute (name) ofelements
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread