• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Genx
• From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@p...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:30:50 +0200
• In-reply-to: <400EF09E.1040106@d...>
• References: <20040121195737.GH30165@s...><C85FBC6B-4B14-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...><200401211840.i0LIeLo07627@d...><200401212120.i0LLKMo09364@d...><400EF09E.1040106@d...>

At 23:35 21.1.2004, you wrote:
>Why not just do everything in UTF-8.  All this wchar_t, "asdfasdf"L 
>support, etc., is going to complicate the API.  Seems simpler to have the 
>basic API, and for those not working in UTF-8 (or its subset:), they only 
>have to remember a single consistent rule:  call "convert()" first.

Genx could be optionally compiled with libiconv support if other encodings 
than UTF-8 are required, libiconv could handle encodings for both input and 
output in that case. Having wchar_t support on systems like windows would 
be the most robust approach though.


with respect,
Toni Uusitalo

• References:
  • Re: Genx
    • From: jcowan@r...
  • Genx
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Genx
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Genx
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Genx
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Genx
• Next by Date: Re: Genx
• Previous by thread: Re: Genx
• Next by thread: Re: Genx
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread