• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Genx
• From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:59:11 -0500
• References: <20040121195737.GH30165@s...> <C85FBC6B-4B14-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...> <200401211840.i0LIeLo07627@d...> <200401212120.i0LLKMo09364@d...>

All this discussion about Unicode/wchar_t/UTF-16/32 is
very good, but one would expect that the discussion about
an XML writing API might focus on other things as well, like

- which members to include / scope of features 
- escaping / what helps the programmer the most
- configurability / options

There have been fewer posts about all of these than about 
the encoding issue, which is a smaller part of the problem.

Karl

• References:
  • Re: Genx
    • From: jcowan@r...
  • Genx
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Genx
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Genx
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: ANNOUNCE: RDF Gateway 2.0 released with free personal edition
• Next by Date: Re: Genx
• Previous by thread: Re: Genx
• Next by thread: re: genx
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread