• To: xml-dev mailing list <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: genx - doctype?
• From: Joe Gregorio <joe@b...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:06:46 -0500
• In-reply-to: <9DECA160-4C8C-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...>
• References: <9DECA160-4C8C-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Tim Bray wrote:

> John Cowan and others have suggested that genx should have a call to put 
> in a DOCTYPE declaration.  This would be trivial to add to the program 
> but it bothers me, so I'm provisionally going to say that I'm not doing 
> this because it's not Canonical XML and the use cases are thin.
> 
> So this is a chance for people to say "I'd like to use genx for XXX, but 
> I can't withou a DOCTYPE because of YYY."  -Tim

I was planning on using genx for XHTML, for which
a DOCTYPE is required.

	-joe

• References:
  • genx - doctype?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: genx - abstract output
• Next by Date: Re: genx - doctype?
• Previous by thread: Re: genx - doctype?
• Next by thread: Re: genx - doctype?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread