• To: xml-dev mailing list <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: genx - abstract output
• From: Bart Schuller <schuller+xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:04:57 +0100
• In-reply-to: <A03C8438-4C8C-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...>
• Mail-followup-to: xml-dev mailing list <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <A03C8438-4C8C-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 07:39:47PM -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
> So this would be a good time to say "I'd use genx for XXX, but if it 
> sticks with FILE * I'm not going to be able to use it because of YYY".

I can't promise I'll use it, but here are some use cases that *do*
serialize, just not to FILE *:

- Storing into a database, as a blob. Needs serialisation to char* most
  likely.
- Sending over a network, within a framework like apache, which has a
  calls like ap_rputc, ap_rprintf and ap_send_fd that should be used.

-- 
Bart.

• References:
  • genx - abstract output
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: genx - string termination and bounding
• Next by Date: Re: genx - doctype?
• Previous by thread: genx: FILE *
• Next by thread: Re: genx - abstract output
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread