• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:02:43 +0400 (AMT)

> > Yes, I have been to fast to answer... The only think we could object is
> > that it would have been better named "URIreference" !
> 
> Actually, the anyURI type also allows non-ASCII characters, so it is
> really the IRI type, but IRIs were not yet defined or even named at
> that point.

Is there a regular expression or BNF grammar for anyURI?

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call forParticipation
• Previous by thread: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• Next by thread: RE: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread