• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
• Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 20:09:24 -0500

Does anyone here know the reasoning behind this? In specific, why does 
xml:base allow URI references (i.e. with fragment identifiers) rather 
than simply using URIs (URIrefs sans fragment identifiers)?

The reason that I ask is that there are some instances in the RDF and 
OWL PR where xml:base's ending in '#' are used so that the base URI 
matches the XML namespace ... I can see the convenience of this but the 
practice strikes me as a bit weird. Perhaps I am missing something.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: wacky XML
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation
• Previous by thread: RE: Another mutated variant of the 'PowerPoint makes yo udumb' story
• Next by thread: Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread