• To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:09:13 +0000
• Cc: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>,XML Developer List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <401153B8.1030409@e...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F1C3@h...> <401153B8.1030409@e...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030704 Debian/1.4-1

Robin Berjon wrote:
>> Doesn't the http:// tell you there is a relationship? What am I missing?
> 
> Doesn't fly too well with relative references does it? ;) And even if 
> you get rid of those, you're still really into the 
> m/^(http|ftp|file|...):/i heuristics there.

<devils-advocate>
   Perhaps you could dereference schemas for all of your input documents
   and look for things of type anyURI rather than messing about with
   heuristics?
</devils-advocate>

ABS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• References:
  • RE: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Next by Date: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Previous by thread: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Next by thread: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread