• To: 'Robin Berjon' <robin.berjon@e...>, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: RE: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:47:39 -0600
• Cc: XML Developer List <xml-dev@l...>

From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin.berjon@e...]

>All I need is knowledge that there are relationships between resources. 
>Why should I have to teach my code about various different constructs in 
>two dozen vocabularies? I don't see what's not to respect in laziness.

So all you want is xlink:href as a flag there is a relationship 
and you will defer any and all other semantic flags to the surrounding 
markup?  Doesn't the http:// tell you there is a relationship? 
What am I missing?

>I'm sorry to hear a hint that sex can get that bad.

It's an American thing.  Failure is not an option. :-)

len

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Next by Date: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Previous by thread: RE: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Next by thread: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread