• To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@d...>,"Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: genx - consensus items
• From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:51:56 -0500
• Cc: "xml-dev mailing list" <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0401221921530.9182-100000@s...>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@d...>


> > I'm inclined to agree.  A teeny bit more complexity in the
> > implementation but probably worth it.  Anyone want to push back? -Tim
> 
> asymnmetry is bad.  open-close, begin-end, etc.

There is no real assymmetry.
Just rename genxStartStartTag to genxStartTag and you have symmetry again.


Karl

• References:
  • Re: genx - consensus items
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: genx - consensus items
• Next by Date: JAXB Reference Implementation Bug ?
• Previous by thread: Re: genx - consensus items
• Next by thread: genx: canonicalization vs. pretty printing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread