• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: genx - consensus items
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:23:18 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: Karl Waclawek <karl@w...>, xml-dev mailing list <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <BCDF20F7-4D23-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...>

> I'm inclined to agree.  A teeny bit more complexity in the
> implementation but probably worth it.  Anyone want to push back? -Tim

asymnmetry is bad.  open-close, begin-end, etc.

	/r$

--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: genx - consensus items
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• References:
  • Re: genx - consensus items
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: genx - abstract output
• Next by Date: Re: genx - consensus items
• Previous by thread: Re: genx - consensus items
• Next by thread: Re: genx - consensus items
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread