• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Genx
• From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:41:34 +0400 (AMT)
• In-reply-to: <012801c3e055$1d466320$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>

Karl Waclawek:
[ Charset windows-1252 unsupported, converting... ]
> 
> > The 'codePoint' typedef may be problematic:
> > 
> >     // Unicode code points (4-byte int on most systems)
> >     typedef wchar_t codePoint;
> 
> How often is UTF-32 actually in use? I would have thought
> that UTF-16 and UTF-8 are the dominant encodings?

Tim has a good article at ongoing. 

http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/04/26/UTF

I think that choice of utf32 and utf8 is good; utf16 is a disaster,
unless it is ucs2.

David

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Genx
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• References:
  • Re: Genx
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• Prev by Date: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Next by Date: Re: Genx
• Previous by thread: Re: Genx
• Next by thread: Re: Genx
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread