• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Genx
• From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:31:05 -0500
• References: <C85FBC6B-4B14-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...> <200401211840.i0LIeLo07627@d...>

> The 'codePoint' typedef may be problematic:
> 
>     // Unicode code points (4-byte int on most systems)
>     typedef wchar_t codePoint;

How often is UTF-32 actually in use? I would have thought
that UTF-16 and UTF-8 are the dominant encodings?

On Expat it works like this:

Depending on compile options we define XML_Char to be
char (for UTF-8), or to be either ushort or wchar_t for UTF-16.
In the latter case the use of wchar_t depends on a given compiler's
ability to define it as a two byte type (which is an option on gcc,
and the default on Windows, covering a big portion of the market).

Karl

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Genx
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• References:
  • Genx
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Genx
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Genx
• Next by Date: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Previous by thread: Re: Genx
• Next by thread: Re: Genx
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread