Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Well, we have implemented "SAX-like" which I guess is what you experts are now calling "SAD". Is that good enough for "proof of concept"? Regards, Ed Day ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alaric B Snell" <alaric@a...> To: "Bill de hÓra" <bill.dehora@p...> Cc: <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: Re: Reusing, Refactoring, Reinventing??? (was Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX) > Bill de hÓra wrote: > > Plus if it's really that simple, why can't some of > > the ASN.1 folks build a SAD engine as proof of concept? > > They may well, they're just focussing on standard SAX to start with, > since there's already an installed base of ContentHandler-implementing > classes to talk to :-) > > > Bill de hÓra > > ABS > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> >
|
