• To: "'Elliotte Rusty Harold'" <elharo@m...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 11:09:06 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <p06002001bbd3f55ecb26@[192.168.254.4]>

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> 
> You've got a new 
> data format here that is not XML, 


It's not new.  ASN.1 has existed for ~20 years, and so has BER.  PER has
existed for ~10 years.


> and there's no reason you have to 
> bloat XML APIs with support for this new format. 


I agree there is no reason.

Alessandro

• References:
  • Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
• Next by Date: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• Previous by thread: Re: Reusing, Refactoring, Reinventing??? (was Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• Next by thread: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread