• To: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
• From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 16:39:08 +0000
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3FA91747.2060801@d...>
• References: <003401c3a2a4$bda48d40$25189bac@aldebaran> <3FA7DF9E.1040304@e...> <3FA8EE05.3040207@a...> <3FA91747.2060801@d...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030704 Debian/1.4-1

Rich Salz wrote:
>> But in any situation where more than one transfer syntax is allowed, 
>> BER should be one of them...
> 
> 
> If ASN.1 and its encodings are going to have an impact on web services, 
> then I'd put DER (unique encoding; necessary for signatures) and PER 
> (unique and compact) way ahead of BER (useful for homogeneous environments)

Hmmm... BER is the simplest to implement, though, and it's not THAT bad 
on the compactness front.

>     /r$

ABS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • RE: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!) and Binary XML not needed...
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
  • Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Challenge
• Next by Date: Re: Challenge
• Previous by thread: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
• Next by thread: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread