• To: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
• Subject: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 10:29:11 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3FA8EE05.3040207@a...>
• References: <003401c3a2a4$bda48d40$25189bac@aldebaran> <3FA7DF9E.1040304@e...> <3FA8EE05.3040207@a...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

> But in any situation where more than one transfer syntax is allowed, BER 
> should be one of them...

If ASN.1 and its encodings are going to have an impact on web services, 
then I'd put DER (unique encoding; necessary for signatures) and PER 
(unique and compact) way ahead of BER (useful for homogeneous environments)
	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>

• References:
  • RE: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!) and Binary XML not needed...
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
  • Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Next by Date: RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Previous by thread: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
• Next by thread: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread