• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
• From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
• Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:31:34 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r02000200-1028-5DDBFB8A115F11D8B3020003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> 
> bob@o... (Bob Foster) writes:
> >If the subject is interoperatility with XML applications, 
> >unquestionably the priority must be to implement SAX 2 as it is.
> 
> I agree with that completely.  Sure, it's messy, but it's a 
> transition strategy, gets ASN.1 consumers immediate access to 
> a lot of XML toolkits, and helps bridge the cultural gap 
> between ASN.1 and XML.


I absolutely agree.

Alessandro


> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org 
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS 
<http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• References:
  • Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
• Next by Date: RE: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
• Next by thread: RE: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread