• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:17:09 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3FABFC4F.4050508@o...>

bob@o... (Bob Foster) writes:
>If the subject is interoperatility with XML applications,
>unquestionably the priority must be to implement SAX 2 as it is.

I agree with that completely.  Sure, it's messy, but it's a transition
strategy, gets ASN.1 consumers immediate access to a lot of XML
toolkits, and helps bridge the cultural gap between ASN.1 and XML.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>

• References:
  • Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1and SAX)
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1and SAX)
• Next by Date: RE: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1and SAX)
• Next by thread: RE: SAX for Binary Encodings (preserving investment) (ASN.1 and SAX)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread