• To: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Subject: Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• From: Oleg Dulin <dulino@o...>
• Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 07:36:04 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <B2D824D4-0F31-11D8-A01C-000A95CCC59E@x...>
• References: <000601c3a33b$36662e50$c801a8c0@DIDIERHOME> <B2D824D4-0F31-11D8-A01C-000A95CCC59E@x...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

>> what is the wheel that will be replaced? What XML rendering language 
>> is to
>> be replaced by XAML.
>>
> XForms for conventional data input, SVG for vector graphics, XML+CSS for 
> rendering, XHTML+DOM for dynamic "browser" pages?

That is precisely the problem.

An MS developer using XAML only needs to learn XAML. Everyone else needs 
to learn 20 different XML languages.

Oleg

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
    • From: Pascal Tran-Ngoc-Bich <pascaltnb@w...>
  • RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
    • From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@n...>

• References:
  • RE: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
• Next by Date: Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Previous by thread: Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Next by thread: Re: Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread