• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: +names--
• From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:26:33 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3F94CCBE.9020508@t...> (Tim Bray's message of "Mon,20 Oct 2003 23:05:50 -0700")
• References: <000201c39611$845a59b0$6401a8c0@pcukmka><3F94A9A3.5080902@t...> <3F94CCBE.9020508@t...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Tim Bray <tbray@t...> was heard to say:
| done."  This leaves the question of whether it *should* be done.  At
| this point the head-count in the "contra" column is larger than in the
| "pro" column, among those who speak up at least.

Just to be counted: contra.

Definitely clever, but I don't think the encoding is the right place
to attack this problem and I think using entity-like names in a
non-entity way would confuse even the most battle hardened veterans on
every other Thursday.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@S...    | Few men are so sufficiently discerning to
XML Standards Architect | appreciate all the evil that they do.--La
Web Tech. and Standards | Rochefoucauld
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE/lTQJOyltUcwYWjsRAgGxAJwP9QPmP/uNQ109sZgpDh6j4lgGUwCdE70B
pY03ypzmZdghOTRcSWnyy7U=
=PIHz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: +names--
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • RE: UTF-8+names
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • +names--
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: re: Namespace entity names Re: UTF-8+names
• Next by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Previous by thread: +names--
• Next by thread: Re: +names--
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread