• To: michael.h.kay@n...
• Subject: Re: UTF-8+names
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:36:03 -0700
• Cc: 'Elliotte Rusty Harold' <elharo@m...>,'XML Dev' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <000201c39611$845a59b0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• References: <000201c39611$845a59b0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Michael Kay wrote:

> The two sentences here are in conflict. The rule tells you thatt the
> replacement value for < is "LT", while the example suggests it is
> "<".

Oops, you're right, good catch.  "&undefined;" represents "&undefined;", 
not "undefined". -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • +names--
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • RE: UTF-8+names
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Politics, and UTF-8+names considered harmful for text
• Next by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Previous by thread: RE: UTF-8+names
• Next by thread: +names--
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread