Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Joern Clausen <joern@T...> writes: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote: > > That is one design flaw in only having a single delimiter for named > > references: > > I don't think that is a flaw. I repeat my question, which was not > answered yet: Why are only elements and attributes subject to a > namespace definition, but not entities? Has this been discussed while > preparing the Namespaces REC, and was it decided not to go this way for > any good reason? Pointers to mail archives are welcome. Are you talking about QNames in entity declarations or entity references? I can just about see <a:b&c:d;e xmlns:c="&fg:h;"/> as an element name. About half the code I write for XML processing deals with namespaces. I'm not looking forward to making that 75%. Ari. -- Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money betting on the outcome.
|
