• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: UTF-8+names
• From: Joern Clausen <joern@T...>
• Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:45:25 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3F94DD75.4070305@a...>
• References: <3F917A29.1000708@t...> <3f96f447.23635425@s...> <20031020170656.GB3723@m...> <3F94A02F.3090703@a...> <1066716882.9084.128.camel@delleric> <3F94DD75.4070305@a...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> That is one design flaw in only having a single delimiter for named 
> references:

I don't think that is a flaw. I repeat my question, which was not
answered yet: Why are only elements and attributes subject to a
namespace definition, but not entities? Has this been discussed while
preparing the Namespaces REC, and was it decided not to go this way for
any good reason? Pointers to mail archives are welcome.

-- 
 Joern Clausen                                joern@T...
 Faculty of Technology           http://www.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE/~joern/
 University of Bielefeld, Germany                        +49 (0)521/106-2494

• Follow-Ups:
  • Namespace entity names Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • RE: UTF-8+names
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • UTF-8+names
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Next by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Previous by thread: Re: UTF-8+names
• Next by thread: Re: UTF-8+names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread