[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


"Bryce K. Nielsen" <bryce@s...> writes:

> Otherwise, to avoid this in general schema-design, only have one
> global element, make the rest complexType or simpleType nodes. One
> should also note that for a schema to be valid, you have to have a
> least one global element (as opposed to a bunch of type nodes).

Not so.  A schema document, or even a schema, with nothing but type
definitions is perfectly valid, and indeed useful -- an xsi:type somewhere
in an instance document, e.g. the document element, would get
everything started just fine.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member