• To: "'Eric van der Vlist'" <vdv@d...>, Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Subject: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWo rking Group
• From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:57:04 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

> From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:vdv@d...] 

> It's raising the bar on the expressiveness of the language 
> used to define the facets, but I think that, yes, it should 
> be easier. 

Hmmm. I wonder about incompatible formal systems (i.e., ones that are based
on different axioms): can we define enough facets for all? Seems intractable
to me, but maybe I'm missing the drift here. 

• Prev by Date: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWo rking Group
• Next by Date: Re: Help for finding root node from XML Schema
• Previous by thread: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWo rking Group
• Next by thread: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWo rking Group
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread