[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> The most important point is that we shouldn't generalize that XML compact > syntaxes are good because RNC is good. No one should use RNC to justify > their own compact syntax; they must justify their compact syntax on its > own > terms. How about we all just agree that in practice all such compact syntaxes must have an XML translation and a reference tool to do the translating? True, if you're on an oddball platform that the reference tool doesn't support, you'll have to write your own translator; that could lead to incompatible translations. Nonetheless, these sorts of incompatibility issues crop up in pure XML tools right now. It's not a perfect world, I'm afraid. Probably a good thing for most of us.
|

Cart



