• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: Re: Pushing all the buttons
• From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:03:26 +1000
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20030922142353.GB21264@s...>
• References: <20030920193326.72006.qmail@w...> <3F6D8FDA.5080607@a...> <20030922142353.GB21264@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030428

John Cowan wrote:

>Single-byte EBCDIC is no harder than any other 8-bit set.  Double-byte
>EBCDIC is another matter.
>  
>
The angle I was trying to take was, for performance, how CPU-cacheable a 
transcoding routine
is. For an ASCII-based 8-bit set, you only need the additional entries 
(e.g. 94, 96, etc.) but
for an EBCDIC set (and an entity with non-minimal characters) there is 
much more chance
that the transcoding won't interact with the cache well (depending on 
sizes, etc.) 

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • Re: Pushing all the buttons
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Pushing all the buttons
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Pushing all the buttons
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: relax ng public list?
• Next by Date: RE: some days I'm wrong
• Previous by thread: Re: Pushing all the buttons
• Next by thread: Re: Pushing all the buttons
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread