• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: relax ng public list?
• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:27:24 +0700
• Cc: veillard@r...
• In-reply-to: <20030923133115.R23863@r...>
• References: <86he35l7ne.fsf@f...> <5.2.0.9.2.20030922165053.02ca3e58@p...> <20030922133603.E23863@r...> <8665jkjjq2.fsf@f...> <3F6FEC30.1070906@j...> <20030923133115.R23863@r...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225

Daniel Veillard wrote:

> This list has a lot of drawback, lot of people won't subscribe to
> it due to the volume, and precisely the fact that it spans a very
> wide set of topics. People looking into learning Relax-NG may
> subscribe to a dedicated list but walk away when looking at xml-dev.
> This list is rather intimidating for newbies, and that's not 
> really its target either based on the discussion going here.

These are all good reasons.  I will try and get a list set up on 
relaxng.org.

James

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: relax ng public list?
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• References:
  • relax ng public list?
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
  • Re: relax ng public list?
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
  • Re: relax ng public list?
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: relax ng public list?
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
  • Re: relax ng public list?
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: relax ng public list?
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ISO turns evil?
• Next by Date: Guidelines for handling of elements' content?
• Previous by thread: Re: relax ng public list?
• Next by thread: Re: relax ng public list?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread