• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: RDF and RELAX NG
• From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:37:30 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@b...>
• In-reply-to: <r02000000-1026-BC51E06ED43D11D7BC220003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <r02000000-1026-BC51E06ED43D11D7BC220003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

>
>This discussion has connected with a number of other conversations to
>leave me wondering whether RELAX NG might prove to be more than a schema
>language capable of of validating RDF/XML, but indeed a schema language
>which eases the conflicts at the boundaries between RDF and XML.
>
>  
>
At one point I'd toyed around with the idea of using <a 
href="http://relaxngcc.sourceforge.net/en/index.htm" >RELAXNGCC</a> to 
emit RDF triples from a RELAXNG schema during the process of validation. 
It looked less than trivial, so I never got around to actually doing it, 
but it would be a cool project.

Along these same lines one might emit triples during the process of 
validating any other XML dialect, using RELAXNGCC, or perhaps using 
Schematron or a custom language that could generate an XSLT to do the work.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDF and RELAX NG
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • RDF and RELAX NG
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?
• Next by Date: The Granularity of Markup (Re: InkML)
• Previous by thread: RDF and RELAX NG
• Next by thread: Re: RDF and RELAX NG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread