• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: The Granularity of Markup (Re: InkML)
• From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>
• Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 02:05:21 -0500
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <r02000000-1026-824A2BEBD3F811D7BC220003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <3F45BB13.3080108@a...>

From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
> Sometime soon we will have standards for parsing data content into
> typeable subelements:
> that will make life more straight forward for this kind of
> graphical-object-description
> language. Until then, we have to make up our own embedded little
> languages sometimes.

Will we? This is a very interesting comment! Sorry to be ignorant, but where
is this standards work taking place?

Bob Foster

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The Granularity of Markup (Re: InkML)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • RE: InkML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • The Granularity of Markup (Re: InkML)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: InkML
• Next by Date: RE: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions
• Previous by thread: Re: The Granularity of Markup (Re: InkML)
• Next by thread: Re: The Granularity of Markup (Re: InkML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread