• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: The Granularity of Markup (Re: InkML)
• From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:01:52 +1000
• In-reply-to: <048201c36944$eb63ba60$6401a8c0@snobird>
• References: <r02000000-1026-824A2BEBD3F811D7BC220003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <3F45BB13.3080108@a...> <048201c36944$eb63ba60$6401a8c0@snobird>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030428

From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  

Sometime soon we will have standards for parsing data content into
typeable subelements:
that will make life more straight forward for this kind of
graphical-object-description
language. Until then, we have to make up our own embedded little
languages sometimes.
    

Will we? This is a very interesting comment! Sorry to be ignorant, but where
is this standards work taking place?

• References:
  • RE: InkML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • The Granularity of Markup (Re: InkML)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: The Granularity of Markup (Re: InkML)
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by Date: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Previous by thread: Re: The Granularity of Markup (Re: InkML)
• Next by thread: RE: InkML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread