• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standardapproach to glueing together ...)
• From: Mitch Amiano <mamiano@n...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:02:08 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3F4ABDFF.4010009@t...>
• Organization: Software Adjuvant
• References: <Pine.SOL.4.33.0308250847090.5815-100000@p...> <3F4ABDFF.4010009@t...>
• Reply-to: mitch.amiano@s...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

Besides, PDF doesn't work with the relational model as well as XML. ;-)

Tim Bray wrote:

> Murali Mani wrote:
> 
>> I will encourage folks to take a look at this:
>>
>> http://www.cs.wpi.edu/~mmani/xml/datamodels/vldbjournal/normal.pdf
> 
> 
> Sounds like it might be interesting but you know, I'm tired, and just 
> not up to the aggravation of clicking on something that ends in ".pdf". 
>  And I bet I'm not the only one.
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: Astandard approach to glueing together ...)
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• References:
  • Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: Astandard approach to glueing together ...)
    • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
  • Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standardapproach to glueing together ...)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by Date: Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: Astandard approach to glueing together ...)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standardapproach to glueing together ...)
• Next by thread: Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: Astandard approach to glueing together ...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread