• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: Astandard approach to glueing together ...)
• From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 08:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
• In-reply-to: <20030825152941.39878.qmail@w...>

I will encourage folks to take a look at this:

http://www.cs.wpi.edu/~mmani/xml/datamodels/vldbjournal/normal.pdf

What I try to say here are:
we can come up with practices for normalization for XML, to come up with
good designs.

Second, we do propose a different theory for unnesting XML to
relational, this is different from nested relational model.. I feel this
is more suited for XML, based on how I feel people try to think about XML.

This might satisfy some curious folks that it might be possible to use XML
for good data management..

Your comments are very welcome..

best regards - murali

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standardapproach to glueing together ...)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by Date: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Previous by thread: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...)
• Next by thread: Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standardapproach to glueing together ...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread