• To: Jerry Sheehan <geralddsheehan@y...>
• Subject: Re: Encoding URI's for xml validation
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 16:47:12 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20030805191719.34072.qmail@w...>
• References: <20030805191719.34072.qmail@w...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Jerry Sheehan scripsit:

> Should this be allowed...The use of the %3A to encode
> the reserved character ':' as shown below?

No.  "%3A" and ":" don't mean the same thing, because ":" is a reserved
character; so IE is justified in rejecting the use of "%3A".

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing
on my shoulders."
        --Hal Abelson

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Encoding URI's for xml validation
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• References:
  • Encoding URI's for xml validation
    • From: Jerry Sheehan <geralddsheehan@y...>

• Prev by Date: Encoding URI's for xml validation
• Next by Date: RE: Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?)
• Previous by thread: Encoding URI's for xml validation
• Next by thread: Re: Encoding URI's for xml validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread