• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Encoding URI's for xml validation
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 03:04:25 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <20030805204711.GS17363@s...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>No.  "%3A" and ":" don't mean the same thing, because ":" is a reserved
>character; so IE is justified in rejecting the use of "%3A".

Surely ":" is not reserved in a path segment?  It has no syntactic
significance there.

-- Richard

• References:
  • Re: Encoding URI's for xml validation
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?)
• Next by Date: Re: Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Encoding URI's for xml validation
• Next by thread: Re: Encoding URI's for xml validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread