• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: opposite of infoset
• From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:44:14 -0500
• References: <r02000000-1026-77DC4694D33311D7A2D00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

What's wrong with document (vs. infoset)? I checked XML 1.0 again just to be
sure, and sure enough that data object you're looking for a name for is
called an "XML document".

> It wouldn't really matter, except that I'm trying to establish a
> distinction, so I don't want to leave readers confused if they came with
> a different set of understandings.

People whose different set of understandings lead them to define "document"
as something other than well-formed text perhaps deserve to be confused.

Bob Foster

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: opposite of infoset
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • RSS for RSS?
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>

• References:
  • Re: opposite of infoset
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: opposite of infoset
• Next by Date: RSS for RSS?
• Previous by thread: Re: opposite of infoset
• Next by thread: RSS for RSS?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread