• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: opposite of infoset
• From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:11:13 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r02000000-1026-3E2022B0D32F11D7A2D00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <r02000000-1026-3E2022B0D32F11D7A2D00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:56:28PM -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> If we look at this example:
> 
> <book  id="rt456">My book</book>
> 
>  From the [MISSING WORD] perspective, we have a start tag for a book
> element which includes some whitespace, then an id attribute with a
> value of "rt456".  The start tag is followed by the text "My book",
> which is then followed by the end tag for the book element.

"lexical" maybe?

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, liam@w..., http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/

• References:
  • opposite of infoset
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions
• Next by Date: Re: opposite of infoset
• Previous by thread: Re: opposite of infoset
• Next by thread: RE: opposite of infoset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread